| Author | Posts |
|---|

- Inari
- Leixlip/Maynooth/Dublin/Kildare - Ireland
- Posts: 21
| # 28 april 2010 at 16:54 I'm looking for an informative debate/discussion here, on what Parkour is...would prefer to avoid what it isn't. I'd also like to avoid this getting into a "Differences between Parkour and Free Running" argument. Hopefully this stays as a discussion and no one starts getting aggressive. Basically I'm posting this because it is something I think about a lot, and have arrived at what I percieve as a fairly concrete conclusion, so would like to talk about it with other Practitioners  To start discussion off: From what I can gather, Parkour is at it's most basic, a training method. A method of getting stronger, faster, increasing endurance etc using only your body and your environment. It is my opinion that all the movements came out of this, and are primarily akin to exercises within a training method. Agree/disagree...post your thoughts! ~Inari, |
| Advertisements | |

- Ivano
- Paris - France
- Posts: 488
- Moderator
| # 28 april 2010 at 17:05 Well, I'd add that this training method has a definite goal, which is to move fast and to be able to overcome any obstacle on your route. Не уверен? Не делай.
Pas sûr? Fais pas.
Not confident? Don't. |

- Inari
- Leixlip/Maynooth/Dublin/Kildare - Ireland
- Posts: 21
| # 29 april 2010 at 12:19 Ok, so you think there has to be a specific goal behind Parkour as well, rather than just the training using your environment. Would you relate this to the Self-Defence aspect of Martial Arts? i.e. Learning the Martial Art will aid you in defending yourself, which is the purpose of the Martial Art, but that people may not learn it for that reason. |

- Ivano
- Paris - France
- Posts: 488
- Moderator
| # 29 april 2010 at 13:32 ?! What?
I don't think you got my point right. 
The thing is that the goal of parkour IS to move more efficiently, faster etc. You can't say that there "has to be" such a goal, because it is actually what parkour is made for. Now the question may be why people do practice parkour. And there you're right, people's reasons may differ one from each other. But the original, the genuine purpose of pk is fast and efficient movement. Actually, when you train, could it be that there is no goal you want to achieve? Не уверен? Не делай.
Pas sûr? Fais pas.
Not confident? Don't. |

- Inari
- Leixlip/Maynooth/Dublin/Kildare - Ireland
- Posts: 21
| # 29 april 2010 at 20:17 The question remains "What is Parkour?" What I said in my original post is that Parkour is a training method. Your post then agreed with it as long as the goal of Parkour is quick and efficient movement. What I was trying to say in my reply is that Parkour, as a training method, enables you to be able to overcome obstacles quickly and efficiently. However, although it CAN allow you to overcome obstacles quickly and efficiently, some people do not use the training method for that purpose. I used the Martial Arts example because a lot of people train in Martial Arts merely for exercise, rather than knowing how to fight. Same with Parkour...a lot of people practise it for exercise and social interraction, rather than for 'Flight' purposes. I hope that this reply makes it a little clearer  |

- andi
- Hard - Austria
- Posts: 74
| # 29 april 2010 at 21:36 Parkour is the art and mindset of overcoming obstacles in your way efficiently. Thats it. No more, no less. Forget all that Martial arts crap, or straight line from point A to B or what not.. You train your body and mind to overcome obstacles, because you want to not be stopped by them. Thats it. Its really that simple All the other stuff many people put it, the martial arts stuff, the religious stuff, the being a gentleman bullshit, the revolution-against-urban-prison stuff and what not.. is all the INDIVIDUAL philosophy of the individual person, but thats what they develop maybe through parkour but they develop it to themselfs, it has nothing to do with parkour as something general. Parkour is simply that - Parkour A |

- Ivano
- Paris - France
- Posts: 488
- Moderator
| # 29 april 2010 at 22:03 Inari, I understand your example with martial arts.
But you, know, it's just like everything else! Some people race cars for a living while others just have fun doing so, as a hobby. Same way, some people practice just to stay fit while others honor the mindset of overcoming obstacles, overcoming yourself etc. I agree with you, the "sport" part of pk is basically a training method. But the word "parkour" itself actually means, as andi said, the spirit of overcoming any kind of obsatcles. IMHO. Peace ^^ Не уверен? Не делай.
Pas sûr? Fais pas.
Not confident? Don't. |

- andi
- Hard - Austria
- Posts: 74
| # 29 april 2010 at 22:32 some people practice just to stay fit while others honor the mindset of overcoming obstacles, overcoming yourself etc.I agree with you, the "sport" part of pk is basically a training method. I dont agree. Because a) it doesnt tell you how to train, so how can it be a training method. You can train any way you want, either you can grow huge ass muscles in the gym and jump around a little, or you can not do any strength training and just do your movements and have them make you stronger, you can do any way you want. So its not right to call it a training method, because there is no method. b) if people just jump around a little, that doesnt make it Parkour. Imagine a House, old greek Style with the huge pillars. Parkour is a building, built on two pillars. The mental, and the physical one. The physical is overcoming obstacles. Its been done for thousands of years, and it has a name: "overcoming obstacles". The mental, is what David Belle has taken and named it the mindset of "Parkour". Parkour is a new word, describing a specific thing. Not everyone that is jumping over an obstacle is doing Parkour. But if you do the jumping over obstacles, and do it with that mindset - then you are doing Parkour. If not, well then your simply jumping over obstacles: 
Agree? |

- Inari
- Leixlip/Maynooth/Dublin/Kildare - Ireland
- Posts: 21
| # 29 april 2010 at 23:02 Martial Arts crap is an simile, nothing more. Used to illustrate and make a point clearer; same as the diagram you so colourfully used  I disagree with the ethos of "Parkour is Parkour - that's it" because that is not it. Parkour, at this point in time, is defined by what the majority of people say (note: Say, not as they 'do'), rather than a concrete definition which is why I wanted to discuss it. My point to you Andi is this; is Parkour the training of your body and mind, or the physical movement?
It is MY opinion that it is the training, as people may move in similar ways, but the seperating factor is the training and purpose behind that movement. I agree that philosophies and ideals attached are down to the individual, and not determined nor dictated by Parkour itself. However it is the nature of philosophies to gain a following, and even in your definition you have included one:
You train your body and mind to overcome obstacles, because you want to not be stopped by them That is a certain philosophy (way of thinking). It portrays an ethos of escapism, liberalism and also some slight strains of claustrophobia. Ivano, I think you see things largely the same as I do. It is like the difference between the child that kicks a ball with a few friends, and the person who lives and breathes playing football. There is always a difference in mindset, determination and biggest of all, dedication. This is seen clearest in the physical training of movements. You can see it when people are drilling their techniques, pushing for perfection, and those who just jump around. And it is this difference in mindset (or in 'Mind', as Andi's picture illustrates), that makes someone a Traceur/Footballer/Guitarist/Etc rather than someone who occasionally enjoys the activity. |
|
| # 29 april 2010 at 23:06 I agree with Andi in the argument against the idea that pk is just a training regiment or form of house wife exercise. Parkour has been around since humans had apposable thumbs. It is and always will be fluid and efficient movement. David Belle and the rest of the Yamakasi or physical 'scientists' just gave this form a name. These physical 'scientists' would experiment with ways of getting around things much faster and a lot more efficiently, I am using the word 'scientist' VERY loosely because none of us are really running around with lab coats or goggles. I have grown up being taught that every physical action is a sport or some form of training for leisure activity, shit my dad tells me that a bike (which I now use for transportation) is ONLY used for leisure activity. BULL SHIT. Parkour is almost impossible to compare to other 'sports' besides gymnastics. Classic sports have actual requirements in order to engage in them: you need jump, sprint power, stamina, and an ego(I know many fat headed players ) to play Basketball, Baseball, Football, and all the other sports. Pk is not like that at all, could be sport yes, but it does not have that intention of creating a competitive sponsored arena like discipline. It is meant for the 'flight' aspect of martial arts or even just incase of emergencies. The real parkour demands for your head to be in the game, just like how Andi has illustrated, without the real mindset of advancing or even having a purpose for pk training, then you are just wasting your time and energy. Its name is meant for the mindset, and physical determination. The movement is just movement. A kid could climb a wall and take 50 years and call it pk, but when you ask him why he did and he just says 'I just felt like it you know? Felt fun..." that is not pk. If he said "I am training [I will edit this, I am on a school computer the post is not complete] |